Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Colbert v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02344
Plaintiff:
Tijuana Colbert
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc., Ethicon LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ainsworth vs. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv04054
Plaintiff:
Danette Ainsworth and Eddy Ainsworth
Defendant:
Cook Group, Inc., Cook Incorporporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kieffaber et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M. Kieffaber and Thomas M. Kieffaber
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snyder et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02473
Plaintiff:
Charlene Snyder and Albert Snyder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02438
Plaintiff:
Anna Potter and Mark Potter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broyles et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02416
Plaintiff:
Kathy Broyles and Gregory Broyles
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02413
Plaintiff:
Pamela McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02317
Plaintiff:
Shannon H. Hicks and James D. Hicks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02318
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Roberts and Dwight Roberts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClain v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02321
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sue McClain
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
