Cases 11 - 20 of 43
MUSSEL WHITE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:16-cv-01700
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MUSSEL WHITE and FRANKLIN MUSSELWHITE
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and others
Peterson et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as NYE/1:15-cv-07356
Plaintiff:
Mirriam A. Peterson and Ben Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Martin v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MD/8:15-cv-03787
Plaintiff:
Preston O. Martin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Johns v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as TXE/4:15-cv-00812
Plaintiff:
Laura K Johns
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Ophoven v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as MN/4:15-md-02652
Plaintiff:
Janice Ophoven
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
WHITEHEAD et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-03980
Plaintiff:
CARLA WHITEHEAD and JOE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES and others
Kotis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as FLS/0:15-cv-60566
Plaintiff:
Evanthia Kotis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc and others
Galambos et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as GAN/1:15-cv-01046
Plaintiff:
Eva C. Galambos and John T. Galambos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Kateian v. Ethicon, Inc., et al.
as CAE/1:11-cv-00611
Plaintiff:
Janice Kateian
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Shafer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as KS/2:14-cv-02633
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shafer and Doris Simpson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
