Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Dimock et al v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2015mc00819
Plaintiff:
Carol Dimock
Defendant:
Ethicon , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology , Johnson & Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Peggy A. Norton
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
JOHNSON v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-00553
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR T. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY DIVISION OF ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. and others
Branning v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MSS/3:14-cv-00993
Plaintiff:
Patricia Branning
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
MELTON v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-02176
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MELTON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
LEWIS et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01838
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LEWIS and JAMES G.B. LEWIS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
BIXBY v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-00334
Plaintiff:
JO ANN BIXBY
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. and others
LEMASTERS et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07282
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA LEMASTERS and CHARLES LEMASTERS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
FILGER et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07121
Plaintiff:
DIANA M. FILGER and TOMMY W. FILGER
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
MOFFETT v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07127
Plaintiff:
SUSANNE MOFFETT
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
INGLAND v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-07116
Plaintiff:
DONNA INGLAND
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
