Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MBIA Insurance Corporation v. FDIC
as 11-5317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MBIA Insurance Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its corporate capacity and as conservator and receiver of INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, F.S.B.
Nicholas Dubois v. Washington Mutual Bank, et al
as 10-5333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas J. Dubois
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Mutual Bank, in receivership, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a New York corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
FDIC v. Van Dorn Retail Inc, et al
as 98-5458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Madison National Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
Morton A. Bender, Scott Bender, Kenneth Bender and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Van Dorn Retail Management, Inc.
Beal Mtge Inc v. FDIC, et al
as 97-5016
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Beal Mortgage, Incorporated, formerly known as BSB Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Bell Federal Savings Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager for the FSLIC Resolution Fund
Auction Company Amer v. FDIC
as 96-5343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Auction Company of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the FSLIC Resolution Trust Fund
FDIC v. Bender, Morton A., et al
as 96-5126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Madison National Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
Morton A. Bender, Scott Bender, Kenneth Bender and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Jeffrey Bender
Appellant:
Gerald Sherman, as co-personal representative of Jeffrey Bender and Donald Reynolds, as co-personal representative of Jeffrey Bender
Defendant - Appellee:
Van Dorn Retail Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Delburt Van Dorn, Marc Goodman, Cindy Van Dorn and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
