Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LU et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv00718
Plaintiff:
QING LU and WEI ZHANG
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
CHINA BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv00291
Plaintiff:
CHINA BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and EAST WEST BANCORP
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
THOMPSON et al v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL et al
as 1:2010cv01657
Plaintiff:
STEVEN THOMPSON and ASTER KIFLE-THOMPSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
QI v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
PAUL QI
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
MUHAMMAD v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv02301
Plaintiff:
ALI S. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
KRUSE WAY LLC v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv01903
Plaintiff:
KRUSE WAY LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
VIRAY v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv01603
Plaintiff:
CARMELITA VIRAY
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. et al v. IRVING, et al.
as 1:2007cv01678
Defendant:
SOUTHSHORE TITLE & ESCROW, INC. , TIMOTHY F. GEPPERT , FAIRFAX REALTY, INC. and others
Receiver:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
WILLIAM C. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
LEGACY FINANCIAL CORPORATION and SAMUEL ADEBAYO
Plaintiff:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
