Cases 31 - 40 of 70
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2015cv01500
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of Animals v. Sally Jewell
as 15-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Friends of Animals
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, Department of the Interior
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL et al v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL, DANIEL M. ASHE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Safari Club International, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5170
Amicus Curiae:
Humane Society International, International Fund for Animal Welfare, Humane Society of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sally Jewell, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Daniel M. Ashe, In his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, An agency of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Safari Club International and National Rifle Association of America
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force and Friends of Animals
Safari Club International, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Safari Club International and National Rifle Association of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, An agency of the United States, Daniel M. Ashe, In his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Friends of Animals and Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. KERRY et al
as 1:2015cv00831
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS and ZIMBABWE CONSERVATION TASK FORCE
Defendant:
JOHN KERRY and SALLY JEWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. ASHE et al
as 1:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS and ZIMBABWE CONSERVATION TASK FORCE
Defendant:
DANIEL M. ASHE and SALLY JEWELL
Movant:
CONSERVATION FORCE and DALLAS SAFARI CLUB
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of Animals v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Friends of Animals
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior and United States Fish and Wildlife Service, an Agency of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Safari Club International
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Humane Society of the United States, Born Free USA, Help Our Wolves Live and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
State of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Safari Club International, U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, National Rifle Association of America and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
State of Minnesota
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 15-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Humane Society of the United States, Born Free USA, Help Our Wolves Live and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
State of Michigan and Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International, National Rifle Association of America and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
State of Minnesota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
