Cases 31 - 40 of 146
Brett Duxbury v. FERC
as 19-72102
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
BRETT HARDING DUXBURY
In re: PG&E Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 19-80089
Respondent:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION
Petitioner:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Debtor:
In re: PG&E CORPORATION
In re: PG&E, et al v. FERC
as 19-80090
Debtor:
In re: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION
Intervenor:
MOJAVE SOLAR, LLC, MIDDLE RIVER POWER, LLC, CLEARWAY ENERGY GROUP, LLC and others
Respondent:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
PG&E v. FERC, et al
as 19-71615
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Intervenor:
EDF RENEWABLES, INC, KES KINGSBURG, L.P., EDP RENEWABLES NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Amicus Curiae:
ENERGY LAW SCHOLARS, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and SIERRA CLUB
American Whitewater, et al v. FERC
as 18-70765
Petitioner:
AMERICAN WHITEWATER, COLUMBIANA, CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Arizona Public Service Company v. FERC
as 17-73244
Petitioner:
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
SMUD, et al v. FERC
as 17-73165
Petitioner:
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Sunland Estate Homeowners Assc v. FERC
as 17-73060
Petitioner:
SUNLAND ESTATE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Sunland HOA
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
CPUC v. FERC
as 17-73013
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
CPUC v. FERC
as 17-72853
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
