Cases 31 - 40 of 69
North Carolina Electric Member, et al v. FERC, et al
as 20-1760
Not Yet Classified:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP, J-POWER USA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD, CALPINE CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
New Jersey Division of Rate Co, et al v. FERC, et al
as 20-1762
Not Yet Classified:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP, CALPINE CORPORATION, J-POWER USA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD and others
Petitioner:
OFFICE OF THE PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL, DELAWARE DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Illinois Commerce Commission v. FERC
as 20-1645
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION
Illinois Municipal Electric Ag v. FERC
as 20-1095
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AGENCY
Illinois Municipal Electric Ag v. FERC
as 20-1090
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AGENCY
Illinois Commerce Commission v. FERC
as 19-3495
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION
Indianapolis Power & Light Co v. FERC, et al
as 18-2104
Petitioner:
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Indianapolis Power & Light Co v. FERC
as 17-2084
Petitioner:
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
LSP Transmission Holdings, LLC, et al v. FERC
as 15-1316
Petitioner:
LSP TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS, LLC and LS POWER TRANSMISSION, LLC
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Settlers Trail Wind Farm, LLC v. FERC
as 14-3023
Petitioner:
SETTLERS TRAIL WIND FARM, LLC
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
