Cases 1 - 4 of 4
DeKalb County, Georgia, et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al
as 13-14447
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA and DEKALB COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as conservator for Federal National Mortgage Association, a federally chartered corporation, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a federally chartered corporation and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Floyd County, Georgia v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al
as 13-14094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD COUNTY, GEORGIA, a Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, a Conservator for Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a Federally Chartered Corporation and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Federally Chartered Corporation
Board of County Commissioners v. FHFA, et al
as 13-7114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Board of County Commissioners of Kay County, Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Federal National Mortgage Association, a federally chartered corporation and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, a federally chartered corporation
Montgomery County Commission, et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al
as 13-12615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMISSION, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated and STEVEN L. REED, Judge of Probate for Montgomery County
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as conservator for Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a federally chartered corporation and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a federally chartered corporation
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
