Cases 11 - 20 of 96
OLSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv03123
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D OLSON and RICHARD D. OLSON
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOFFLER v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv02744
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOFFLER
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROBINSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv02590
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L ROBINSON, III and BOBBY L. ROBINSON, II
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BAKER v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BAKER
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NADER v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
as 1:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
WADITH NADER and WADITH S. NADER
Defendant:
Secretary FRANK KENDALL, III and SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Mr. Glenn G. Coleman
Defendant:
Hon. FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
COLEMAN v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. COLEMAN
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
PRECISION METALS CORP. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2022cv01586
Plaintiff:
PRECISION METALS CORP., ANTHONY C. FIGLOZZI and THOMAS J. FIGLOZZI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
HARRISON v. KENDALL, III
as 1:2022cv01380
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. HARRISON
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006 Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
