Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-14417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, EPA, Region IV and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL BANKS, EPA, NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and others
Miccosukee Tribe, et al v. New Hope Sugar Co., et al
as 10-14131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Intervenor - Appellant:
OKEELANTA CORPORATION and NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY
Defendant:
USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
In re: South Florida Water Management
as 10-13640
Petitioner:
In re: SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY, FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES and others
USA, et al v. Miccosukee Tribe, et al
as 10-12997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federall-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden and others
:
SERVICE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
New Hope Sugar Co., et al v. Miccosukee Tribe
as 10-12750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY and OKEELANTA CORPORATION
:
SERVICE
Miccosukee Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-12751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federall-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, EPA, Region IV, Lisa Jackson and others
:
SERVICE
State of Florida Department v. Miccosukee Tribes, et al
as 10-12752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
:
SERVICE
Friends of the Everglades v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv21785
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Everglades, Friends of the Everglades, Friends of the Everglades and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 8:2008cv05606
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. , Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc. , Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson
Intervenor_defendant:
City of New York , City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners , Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
State Of New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Washingon
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe Of Indians Of Florida , Friends of the Everglades , Florida Wildlife Federation and others
Interpleader_defendant:
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Miccosukee Tribe v. USA, et al
as 1:2004cv21448
Plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida
Defendant:
United States , Environmental Protection Agency , Administrator of National Banks and others
Consol_defendant:
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection , New Hope Sugar Company and Okeelanta Corporation
Consol_plaintiff:
Friends of the Everglades
Intervenor_defendant:
New Hope Sugar Company and Okeelanta Coporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
