Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Patrick Gibson v. Edith Kroha, et al
as 20-35697
Defendant:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. STEVEN HAMMOND and DALE FETROE
Defendant / Appellee:
EDITH KROHA, ARNP,Washington State Dept of Corrections, Clallam Bay Correctional Center (DOC)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK K. GIBSON
Christopher Bistryski v. Sheryl Allbert, et al
as 20-35349
Defendant:
DOC HEALTH SERVICES OF STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER, MICHAEL FURST, MEDICAL SERVICES SANCTIONER, Olympia, WA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE C. GAGE, MD, Chief of Psychiatry of WA-DOC and SHERYL ALLBERT, ARNP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDREW BISTRYSKI
Gail Vincent v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 20-35172
Defendant:
BRYAN KING, DOC Food Program Manager & CRCC Facility Food Manager, KERRI MCTARSNEY, Grievance Coordinator, SCCC, M. HOLTH, Grievance Coordinator, CBCC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNARD WARNER, Secretary, DOC, PAT DOE 1, Religious Dietary Final Policy Makers, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL VINCENT
Peter McDaniels v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 19-35245
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENT CARNEY, State Dietician, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF WASHINGTON, RHONDA WILLIAMSON, substitutes for Defendant Joe Williamson and others
Defendant:
LABOR ORGANZIATIONS, CI FOOD PLANT PRODUCTION/STORAGE, JOE WILLIAMSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER J. MCDANIELS
Daniel Haldane, et al v. G. Hammond, et al
as 17-80197
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DANIEL HALDANE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, WENDEL JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY MARTIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
G. STEVEN HAMMOND, Chief Medical Officer of the Washington Department of Corrections, in their official capacities and DAN PACHOLKE, Secretary of the Washington Department of Corrections, in their official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
