Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-73345
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Real Party In Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheryl Moulton v. Gayle Kern, et al
as 11-17646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYLE A. KERN, GAYLE A. KERN LTD, PHIL FRINK & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Kern et al v. Moulton
as 3:2011cv00296
Plaintiff:
Gayle A. Kern and Gayle A. Kern, LTD
Defendant:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sheryl Moulton v. Gayle Kern, et al
as 11-15584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYLE A. KERN, GAYLE A. KERN LTD., ULLA CHRISTENSEN and others
Sheryl Moulton v. Eugene Burger Management Corpo, et al
as 11-15554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EUGENE BURGER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation, EUGENE J. BURGER, KEIN BERG and others
Sheryl Moulton v. Gayle Kern, et al
as 11-15526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYLE A. KERN, GAYLE A. KERN LTD, PHIL FRINK & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Moulton v. Kern
as 3:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Ulla Christsensen, John R. Coleman, Raymond Corrigan and others
Counter Claimant:
Gayle A. Kern and Gayle A. Kern, LTD
Counter Defendant:
Sheryl Moulton
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moulton v. Kern et al
as 2:2010cv02264
Defendant:
Ulla Christensen, John R. Coleman, John R Colman and others
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
