Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. Trio Printing Company et al
as 1:2019cv02401
Defendant:
Trio Printing Company, Christopher Kuhl, Polly Jung and others
Plaintiff:
George Tedeschi, Malcolm Pritzker and Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund
Petitioner:
D. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. J&J Mr. Quick Print, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02197
Defendant:
D/B/A J&J Printing Company, J&J Mr. Quick Print, Inc., James Rodzak and others
Plaintiff:
George Tedeschi, Malcolm Pritzker and Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund et al v. Smith Feeman, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Smith Feeman, Inc., Hyde Brothers Printing and Marketing, LLC, Excalibur Business Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. American Printing Company, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
American Printing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
District Council 4 of the Graphic Communications v. Graphic Communications of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2013cv07912
Plaintiff:
District Council Four of the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Robert S. Miller and Frank W. Golden
Defendant:
Graphic Communications of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters , George Tedeschi , Robert Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Graphic Communications Confere, et al v. Bruce Printing, et al
as 13-3371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONSCONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, GEORGE TEDESCHI, Trustee and MALCOM PRITZKER, Trustee
Defendant:
BRUCE PRINTING
Respondent - Appellant:
FRANK M. CLARK, III
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund v. Bruce Printing
as 1:2012cv01659
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the IBT National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcom Pritzker
Defendant:
Bruce Printing
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund, et al. v. Kestler Graphics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Kestler Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund v. Cardinal Color Print
as 1:2011cv03985
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Cardinal Color Print
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund v. Darco Metal Litho Company et al
as 1:2010cv06814
Defendant:
Darco Metal Litho Company , Darco Enterprises, Inc. , Northern Container Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
George Tedeschi , Malcolm Pritzker and Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
