Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Richard Theis v. Christopher J. Paucek et al
as 1:2020cv03360
Defendant:
Timothy M Haley, Edward S Macias, Catherine A. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Theis
Nominal Defendant:
2U, Inc.
Glover-Mott v. Herd et al
as 1:2022cv03146
Plaintiff:
MARILEE C. GLOVER-MOTT
Defendant:
Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian, Ann Mather and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble Inc.
REVOLUTION LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv00980
Defendant:
James A. DePalma, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Robert V. LaPenta and others
Plaintiff:
James Glavan
Petitioner:
Patrick Graham, Craig Holman, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Bob Bishop
UA Local 13 Pension Fund v. Bumble Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
UA Local 13 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Bumble Inc., Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Liu v. Foley et al
as 1:2021cv04687
Plaintiff:
Xingqi Liu
Defendant:
John Foley, Jill Woodworth, Erik Blachford and others
Genack v. Foley
as 1:2021cv04583
Plaintiff:
Moshe Genack
Defendant:
John Foley, William Lynch, Erik Blachford and others
Chu v. Foley et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Defendant:
Pamela Thomas-Graham, Jill Woodworth, William Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Chu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Walters v. TC PipeLines, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00675
Defendant:
Gloria Hartl, Malyn K. Malquist, Stanley Graham Chapman, III and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walters
Foti v. TC PipeLines, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00828
Defendant:
Gloria Hartl, Stanley Graham Chapman III, Malyn K. Malquist and others
Plaintiff:
David Foti
Zajac v. TC PipeLines, LP et al
as 1:2021cv01047
Defendant:
Gloria Hartl, Stanley Graham Chapman III, Malyn K. Malquist and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Zajac
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
