Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Martinez Medina et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv03347
Plaintiff:
JOSE CANDIDO MARTINEZ MEDINA, BRENDA XIOMARA CRUZ LOPEZ, DELMY MUNOZ GUZMAN and others
Defendant:
GREGORY L. COLLETT, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
VASQUEZ ROCA v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
CARLOS AVILIO VASQUEZ ROCA
Defendant:
CONRAD J. ZARAGOZA, GREGORY L. COLLETT, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b
SHODIPE v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, CONRAD J. ZARAGOZA, GREGORY L. COLLETT and others
Plaintiff:
OLUWAFEMI SAMUEL SHODIPE
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
HERNANDEZ ROJAS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv01422
Plaintiff:
YESICA DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ ROJAS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
JAFARZADEH et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01385
Plaintiff:
RAZEYEH JAFARZADEH and MANOUCHEHR JAFARZADEH
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ, GREGORY L. COLLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00911
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
