Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Spiegler v. Mish Mish Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08774
Plaintiff:
Gal Spiegler
Defendant:
Mish Mish Inc. and Mishelle Weinerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Thomas v. Riskified Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Philip G. Thomas
Defendant:
Riskified Ltd., Eido Gal, Assaf Feldman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Epismenio Cacao Tzul v. Gal Bi Ma Eul Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06921
Plaintiff:
Duglas Epismenio Cacao Tzul
Defendant:
Gal Bi Ma Eul Inc. doing business as Galbi Ma Eul and Yun Kil Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Boohoo Group PLC et al
as 1:2021cv05273
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Boohoo.com USA, Inc., Nastygal.com USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. Boohoo Group PLC et al
as 1:2019cv10170
Plaintiff:
Malibu Textiles, Inc.
Defendant:
Boohoo.com USA, Inc., Does 1 through 10, Boohoo.com UK, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ventura v. Herreros et al
as 1:2018cv06478
Plaintiff:
Vianey Ventura
Defendant:
Amado Herreros, GAL FOOD CORP., Francisco Herreros and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stephanie L Gal
as 1:2017mc00516
Petitioner:
Stephanie L Gal
Cause Of Action: M 09-282 Attorney Change of Name
Buestan v. Gal Bi Ma Eul, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06123
Plaintiff:
Segundo Jose Buestan
Defendant:
Gal Bi Ma Eul, Inc., Jing Shu Kim and Yun Kil Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Love et al v. Nasty Gal Inc.
as 1:2016cv06063
Plaintiff:
Pamela Love and Pamela Love Jewelry, LLC
Defendant:
Nasty Gal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Love et al v. Nasty Gal Inc.
as 1:2016cv06066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Love and Pamela Love Jewelry, LLC
Defendant:
Nasty Gal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
