Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 353
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Pro Recovery Services Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02929
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Pro Recovery Services Inc., Rakhmin Ustayev and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Dinesh Verma Medical, P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02893
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Dinesh Verma Medical, P.C., Dinesh Verma, D.O. and John Doe Defendants "1" - "10"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Top Choice Pharmacy Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02875
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Top Choice Pharmacy Corp., Petr Fakhlayev, Georgiy Davidov and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Health Choice Pharmacy, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02867
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Health Choice Pharmacy, Inc., Affinity RX, Inc. doing business as Affinity Pharmacy and Albert Yakubov
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Dinesh Verma Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv02893
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Dinesh Verma Medical, P.C., Dinesh Verma, D.O. and John Doe Defendants "1" - "10"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship) et al
as 1:2022cv02860
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Gepp Psychological Services, PLLC, Karin Gepp and others
Petitioner: Law Office of Eitan Dagan P.C.
Respondent: Vladislav Stoyanovsky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Waldman et al
as 1:2022cv02858
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mel Waldman, Ph.D., MW Psychology, P.C., MWaldman Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Stybel et al
as 1:2022cv02834
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Elena Borisovna Stybel, D.O., Elena Borisovna Stybel, M.D.,(A Sole Proprietorship) and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Town Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02343
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Town Supply, Inc., Olga Izrayev and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Boulevard 9229 LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02160
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Boulevard 9229 LLC, Ishbay Shukurov, Albertson Pharmacy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?