Cases 1 - 10 of 3,768
Rajabian, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
as 24-3000
Plaintiff:
ZAKIA JACKLINE RAJABIAN and DULCERIA LA BONITA WHOLESALE LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, PHOENIX MOTOR COMPANY INCORPORATED, an Arizona Corporation doing business as Mercedes-Benz of Scottsdale, VERN FOUTZ and others
Uquiche-Nahui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2960
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR UQUICHE-NAHUI, MIRIAM JUDITH GONZALES-BONIFACIO and J. E. U.G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
First American Title Insurance Company v. Commerce Associates, LLC, et al.
as 24-2718
Plaintiff:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
COMMERCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, TG INVESTMENTS, LLC and TOM GONZALES
Villeda-Gonzales v. Garland
as 24-2689
Petitioner:
OSCAR MANUEL VILLEDA-GONZALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Gonzales
as 24-2650
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FRANK GONZALES
Mateo Siche, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2320
Petitioner:
ANDRES EZEQUIEL MATEO SICHE, MILAGRITOS STEFANY MARCOS TEJADA, GIANELLA AYMAR GONZALES MARCOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales v. Mayes, et al.
as 24-2281
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOPEZ GONZALES
Defendant:
KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, named Kristin K Mayes, Arizona Attorney General, , Maricopa County Attorney, AMANDA M. PARKER, Deputy County Attorney and others
Cadena, et al. v. Customer Connexx, LLC, et al.
as 24-2121
Plaintiff:
CARIENE CADENA and ANDREW GONZALES
Defendant:
CUSTOMER CONNEXX, LLC and JANONE, INC.
Cavazos v. Garsilaso, et al.
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant:
N. GARSILASO, J. TREJO, G. GONZALES and others
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
