Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzales et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00724
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Alqueza Gonzales , Rolando Alqueza Gonzales and Patrocinio Pio Bayot Gonzales
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of State - National Visa Center, United States Embassy in the Philippines - Immigrant Visa Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
GONZALES v. CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES INC
as 3:2012cv00095
Petitioner:
MARK GONZALES
Defendant:
CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Russo v. Commercial Research & Recovery et al
as 0:2011cv60230
Plaintiff:
Stephen Russo
Defendant:
Commercial Research & Recovery, Sally Bloom and Jorge L. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Jose Francisco Cifuentes Gonzales
as 1:2009mc23376
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Francisco Cifuentes Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3181 Extradition to Foreign Country
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
