Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
RIER et al v. LI et al
as 1:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
JAMIE RIER and DAVID A. MCSHERRY, SR.
Defendant:
TAO LI, LIAN FU LIU, YU HAO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANNER BAYWOOD HEART HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01799
Plaintiff:
BANNER BAYWOOD HEART HOSPITAL , BANNER BAYWOOD MEDICAL CENTER , BANNER DESERT MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
PATUXENT GREENS COUNTRY CLUB v. FULLER
as 1:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
PATUXENT GREENS COUNTRY CLUB
Defendant:
KEVIN FULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREENE v. NATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 1:2008cv01763
Plaintiff:
SARAH M. GREENE
Defendant:
NATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Genesis Health Ventures of Nau v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-5378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Genesis Health Ventures of Naugatuck, Inc., Derby Nursing Center Corporation, Health Resources of Rockville, Inc., doing business as Fox Hill Center and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Johnson, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Southeast Alabama Medical Cent v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-5156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Southeast Alabama Medical Center, Marshall Medical Center South, Marshall Medical Center North and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Leavitt, Charles E. Johnson and Kathleen Sebelius
Ashcraft & Gerel v. Coady, Edward
as 00-7105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ashcraft & Gerel, a general partnership organized under the law of the District of Columbia
Defendant - Appellant:
Edward Paul Coady
Third-Party Defendant - Appellee:
James F. Green and Lawrence Pascal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
