Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Vincent Richmond v. Robert Mckittrick, et al
as 19-12677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT RICHMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BENJAMIN GREENBERG and ROBERT MCKITTRICK
Greenberg v. The Keyes Company
as 0:2019cv61556
Plaintiff:
Charles Greenberg
Defendant:
The Keyes Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgewater Products, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing, et al.
as 1:2019cv22181
Defendant:
Detroit Diesel, Washtenaw County Proseutors Office, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Co-Patent Owners US #6,889,615, et al. and Bridgewater Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Greenberg v. Real Estate Sales, LLC
as 0:2019cv61175
Defendant:
Real Estate Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenberg v. Real Estate Sales, LLC
as 0:2019cv61173
Defendant:
Real Estate Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenberg v. Doctors Associates, Inc.
as 1:2018cv22505
Plaintiff:
Charles Greenberg
Defendant:
Doctors Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenberger v. Mattrob, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60437
Plaintiff:
Stephen Greenberger
Defendant:
Mattrob, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenberger v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv61905
Plaintiff:
Stephen Greenberger
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC , Experian Information Solutions, Inc. , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McElveen v. Westport Recovery Corporation et al
as 0:2017cv61816
Plaintiff:
Lara E. McElveen
Defendant:
Debra L. Greenberg and Westport Recovery Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martin Siegel, et al v. AirTran Holdings, Inc., et al
as 17-11914
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTIN SIEGEL, STEPHEN POWELL, HENRYK J. JACHIMOWICZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC. and AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
