Cases 11 - 20 of 97
USA, et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 14-55879
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, Daniel Thompson
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL THOMPSON, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Aerotec International, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 14-15562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AEROTEC INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arizona corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Thomas Berg, et al v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al
as 13-35617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS A. BERG, RYNE J. LINEHAN, NAYER M. MAHMOUD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and HONEYWELL, INC.
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA, et al v. United Healthcare of Arizona,, et al
as 12-17604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPINEDEX PHYSICAL THERAPY USA INCORPORATED, CLAUDE ARAGON, JACK ADAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE OF ARIZONA, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Mark Taylor, et al v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al
as 12-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK LEE TAYLOR and PAMELA TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and JEPPESEN SANDERSON, INC.
Dennis Hellervik, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 12-56373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS HELLERVIK and THO HELLERVIK
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY (USA), INC., sued individually and as successor in interest to Mundet Cork Company and others
Asmaa Guennoon, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16771
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASMAA GUENNOON, individually, as legal guardian of Kenza Tazi Moukha and Amina Tazi Moukha, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Rajea Tazi Moukha, deceased, M'BARKA ASRI, individually, as legal guardian of Mohamed Amine Faouzi and Zayed Faouzi, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Ahmed Faouzi, deceased, ASMAA BERGHAZI, individually, as legal guardian of Yassine Haddour and Yazid Haddour, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate Fouad Haddour, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Margita Gergelova, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16767
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGITA GERGELOVA, and as successor -in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, VIKTOR GERGEL, and as successor-in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased, and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, ALIA FAROUKH, and as legal guardian for Karim Warde Khalifeh and Mohamad Ali Khalifeh, as successor-in-interest to Hussein Mounir Khalifeh deceased and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hussein Mounir Khalifeh and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Renato Cotta v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16769
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENATO MACHADO COTTA, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bianca Pires Cotta
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Anna Hudecova, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16756
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNA HUDECOVA, individually, as successor-in-interest to Michal Hudec, deceased, and as personal representative of the Estate of Michael Hudec, MONIKA HUDECOVA, individually and as succesor-in-interest to Michael Hudec, deceased and MICHAELA JURIGOVA HUDECOVA, individually and as successor-in-interest to Michael Hudev
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
