Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Graham et al v. DePuy Synthes, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04768
Plaintiff:
William Graham and Alison Beth Graham
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes, Inc., Medical Device Business Services, Inc., Synthes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Loughran v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Loughran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hofmann et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 9:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hofmann and Michael W. Hofmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hofmann et. al. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hofmann and Michael W. Hofmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teele v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv07552
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rodney Teele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rosenthal v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv05507
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Plaintiff:
Laurie I. Rosenthal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Britten v. Stryker Sales Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Audrey Britten
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGovern Zurica et al v. Stryker Sales Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv04615
Defendant:
Corin U.S.A. Limited, Inc., Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn McGovern Zurica and Thomas Zurica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
