Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Safari Club International v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 13-5300
Plaintiff - Appellant: Safari Club International
Plaintiff - Appellee: Terry Owen, Roy Leifester, Karlton Beal and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Daniel M. Ashe, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Movant - Appellee: Humane Society of the United States and Born Free USA
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Friends of Animals and Defenders of Wildlife
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 13-5307
Plaintiff - Appellee: Humane Society of the United States
Plaintiff - Appellant: Harvey Dillenburg and Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Safari Club International v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 13-5300
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ray Dockery, Roy Leifester, Galen Akin and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Defenders of Wildlife, Humane Society of the United States, Born Free USA and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Safari Club International
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
as 1:2013cv01534
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant: AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Thomas Vilsack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5293
Plaintiff - Appellant: Humane Society of the United States
Plaintiff - Appellee: Harvey Dillenburg and Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. MCCARTHY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01306
Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , FOOD & WATER WATCH , HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant: GINA MCCARTHY and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. SALAZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00186
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, BORN FREE USA, HELP OUR WOLVES LIVE and others
Defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF WISCONSIN, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES and MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv01965
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and FUND FOR ANIMALS
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, KENNETH SALAZAR and DANIEL ASHE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Carolyn Jurewicz, et al v. AGRI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5331
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carolyn Jurewicz, Hunte Corporation, Missouri Pet Breeders Association and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Agriculture
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Humane Society of the United States
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. VILSACK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01582
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES , HARVEY DILLENBURG and IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT
Defendant: TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?