Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BREEZEE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
JASON M BREEZEE, KYLE M. BUMP, CHRISTOPHER L. BURNHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
AINSWORTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02424
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A AINSWORTH, JODI CATHLEEN NAKATA, JILL MARIE HIGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court:
CLYDE WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY, ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
MENDOZA et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Teddy Mendoza, The Estate of Valerie Hale and ESTATE OF VALERIE HALE
Defendant:
WMATA and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
HALE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv01390
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. HALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ZHANG v. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP et al
as 1:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
JAMES ZHANG
Defendant:
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP and MICHAEL SCOTT LAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
