Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Primous v. United States Attorney General James et al
as 6:2024cv06143
Plaintiff:
Hazel Primous
Defendant:
James Kennedy, Jr., Trini Ross, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrams v. Standard Caribbean Shipping, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Hazel Abrams
Defendant:
Standard Caribbean Shipping, Inc. and Williams Worldwide Shipping & Trading Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
AKF, Inc. v. S and S Morris, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06922
Defendant:
S and S Morris, LLC d/b/a Pirtek Sarasota, Sarah Mary Hazel, Stephen Paul Morris and others
Plaintiff:
AKF, Inc. d/b/a Fundkite, AKF, Inc. and AKF, Inc. doing business as Fundkite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
New York Life Insurance Company v. Pascal-Brown et al
as 1:2017cv05848
Defendant:
Denis Campbell, Floyd Campbell, Marion Pascal-Brown and others
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Sterling Ornaments Pvt. Ltd. v. Hazel Jewelry Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv08822
Plaintiff:
Sterling Ornaments Pvt. Ltd.
Defendant:
Hazel Jewelry Corporation and Kenan Ozkan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
2910 Hazel LLC v. Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv07178
Plaintiff:
2910 Hazel LLC, Dayton Towers Corporation and Dayton Towers Corporation
Defendant:
Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Consol Plaintiff:
The RAIN Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Arguetta v. John Senko Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
Hazel Arguetta
Cross Claimant:
John Senko Inc.
Defendant:
John Senko Inc. and TACA International Airlines, Sociedad Anonima
Cross Defendant:
TACA International Airlines, Sociedad Anonima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
