Cases 1 - 10 of 44
McManus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2023cv61963
Plaintiff:
Heather McManus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curtis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Heather Curtis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Leahy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv14355
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Leahy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Botton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Heather Dawn Botton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Itani v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Heather Itani
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tyner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02943
Plaintiff:
Heather Jade Tyner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burdick v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv23180
Plaintiff:
Heather Burdick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
v. Social Security et al
as 1:2021cv23179
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Heather Burdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Burdick v. Social Security
as 1:2021cv23161
Plaintiff:
Heather Burdick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Terrovano v. Social Security
as 9:2021cv81377
Plaintiff:
Heather Terrovano
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
