Cases 41 - 50 of 228
Hernandez Sebastian-Nicolas v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3670
Petitioner:
HERNANDEZ SEBASTIAN-NICOLAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Bruno Ramirez-Camela
as 21-1581
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUNO FREDDY RAMIREZ-CAMELA, aka Ismael Hernandez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rene Hernandez v. USA
as 21-5526
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENE DAVID HERNANDEZ
Janet Malam, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 21-1433
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAD F. WOLF, DHS Secretary, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
JANET MALAM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RENE HERNANDEZ-VERGARA and SAMIR YOUSIF KADA
Claribel Diaz-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3333
Petitioner:
CLARIBEL DEL ROSARIO DIAZ-HERNANDEZ, TANIA PRISCILA MELARA-DIAZ and NANCY IVETH MELARA-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Manuela Pasqual v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3221
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
MANUELA HERNANDEZ PASQUAL, aka Manuela Tomas Pasqual
Steven Knapp v. Metro Govt of Nashville, et al
as 21-5219
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY WHITING, Official Capacity, METRO DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AGENCY, et al., JAMES K. HARBISON, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN CHRISTOPHER KNAPP
Francisca Hernandez-Hernandez, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3210
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ and A. L. H. H.
Cristobal Pateapa-Hernandez v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3191
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
CRISTOBAL PATEAPA-HERNANDEZ
Marilu Ortiz-Hernandez v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3185
Petitioner:
MARILU ORTIZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
