Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Nathanson v. Prince et al
as 1:2007cv10333
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Nathanson
Defendant:
Charles Prince, Robert E. Rubin, Winfried Bischoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cinotto v. Prince et al
as 1:2007cv09900
Plaintiff:
Gary Cinotto
Defendant:
Charles Prince, Michael C. Armstrong, Alain J.P. Belda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Harris v. Prince et al
as 1:2007cv09841
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris
Defendant:
Charles Prince, Robert E. Rubin, Winfried Bishcoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Euronet Payments & Remittance, Inc. v. Envios de Valores la Nacional Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv05467
Petitioner:
Euronet Payments & Remittance, Inc.
Respondent:
Envios de Valores la Nacional Corp., Envios de Valores la Nacional Corp., Envios de Valores la National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust v. Fuld et al
as 1:2007cv03950
Plaintiff:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust and Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Joseph M. Gregory, Christopher M. O'Meara and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Garber v. Fuld et al
as 1:2007cv02990
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Garber, Robert L. Garber, Robert L. Garber and others
Defendant:
Richard S. Fuld, Michael L. Ainslie, John F. Akers and others
Movant:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
