Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lovell et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
as 1:2021cv21724
Plaintiff:
Clayton Lovell, Jr., Andrew Lovell, Sarah Lovell and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Giant Eagle Markets, Inc., BJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Will v. Boehringer Ingelahm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv82028
Defendant:
PAI Holdings, LLC, Rite Aid Corporation, Aurobindo and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Will
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantrelle v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv81692
Defendant:
PAI Holdings, LLC, United Health Care Inc.,, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tate Cantrelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81685
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., United Health Care Inc.,, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Norma Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Muscle Elements, Inc.
as 9:2019mc80784
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Muscle Elements, Inc.
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Muscle Elements, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80777
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Muscle Elements, Inc.
W.W.SPORTS IMPORTADORA EXPORTADORA E COMERCIAL LTDA v. BPI SPORTS, LLC, et al
as 0:2016cv60147
Plaintiff:
W.W.SPORTS IMPORTADORA EXPORTADORA E COMERCIAL LTDA
Defendant:
BPI Sports, LLC , BPI Sports Holdings, LLC , Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Nutrition Training Systems, LLC, et al
as 0:2015cv60251
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mushtaq Hussain and Nutrition Training Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hostrup v. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2014cv23309
Plaintiff:
Maria Hostrup
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
