Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. Ainyvapor Electronic Cigarette Wholesaler
as 1:2016cv07079
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", KIMWOOD Professional Tempered Glass Manufacturer, Factory Sales and others
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc, E-Hose Technologies LLC and PhD Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv01522
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 14beautystore2014, Benwon Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv07660
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Dongguan Betos Electronic Co., Ltd., et al.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. Cloud Commerce Systems, Ltd.
as 1:2015cv04702
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Cloud Commerce Systems Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2014cv09898
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
Counter_claimant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
Counter_defendant:
E-Hose Technologies LLC and PhD Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Metraflex Company, The v. Flex-Hose Company, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00302
Plaintiff:
Metraflex Company, The, Metraflex Company, The and Metraflex Company, The
Defendant:
Flex-Hose Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
