Cases 1 - 5 of 5
NYANIFY, Inc., et al. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
TRADEMARK HOLDER IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT 1 HERETO and Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, shagaiyioump, FGJ-BVM21 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Nobis Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv10886
Plaintiff:
Nobis Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zhang yi, Yu Sen Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07667
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Ziyi, Yiyi Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv10970
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
QinQinDe friend, Qinqinde Friend, et al., Fuzhou Golden Sun Promotions Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Deckers Outdoor Corporation et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv10152
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation, Mary Briggs and Factorrealestate.EU
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Huan Wu, et al., Dang Dangdang Dang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
