Cases 1 - 8 of 8
A. et al v. Independence Blue Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark A., Tracy A. and M.A.
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross, QCC Insurance Company and Independence Personal Choice PPO Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
P. et al v. Independence Blue Cross
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Pamela P. and C. Z.
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D. et al v. Independence Blue Cross
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
L. D. and M. D.
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
IHC Health Services Inc. v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01273
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services Inc.
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation and Independence Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IHC Health Services v. Afilias USA et al
as 2:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Afilias USA and Independence Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IHC Health Services v. Independence Blue Cross et al
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Conway et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Conway , Corey Musselman , San Antonio Orthopedic Group LLP and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Conway, D.C. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 5:2015cv04905
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. , Corey Musselman, M.D. , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, L.L.P. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
