Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Ibrahim Koussan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 07-4107
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, IMMIGRATION CLINIC OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY and others
Petitioner:
IBRAHIM ALI KOUSSAN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Castruita-Gomez, et al v. Holder
as 06-74582
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER CASTRUITA-GOMEZ, aka Francisco J. Castruita, Francisco Castruita, Francisco Javier Castruita
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
IMMIGRANT DEFENSE PROJECT, NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, U.C. DAVIS IMMIGRATION LAW CLINIC and others
Estrada-Espinoza, et al v. Mukasey
as 05-75850
Petitioner:
JUAN ELIAS ESTRADA-ESPINOZA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, The Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, Immigration Law Clinic (UC-Davis), NIPNLG (National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild), WDAIP (Washington Defender Association Immigration Project)
USA v. Aguila-Montes De Oca
as 05-50170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER and others
Anaya-Ortiz, et al v. Mukasey
as 03-74666
Petitioner:
VIRGILIO ANAYA-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
THE FLORENCE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT, IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, IMMIGRATION LAW CLINIC, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS LAW SCHOOL and others
Amicus - Amicus Curiae:
THE FLORENCE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
