Cases 1 - 9 of 9
George Mano v. Janet Yellen, et al
as 23-2661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE GAIO MANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET YELLEN, as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Louis Giannini, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-2503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS GIANNINI and DAWN GIANNINI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS AGENTS, Any/All and others
Scott Gillespie, et al v. IRS
as 16-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT E. GILLESPIE and DEBRA J. GILLESPIE
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Department of the Treasury
Estate of Harold Stuller, et al v. USA
as 15-1545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF HAROLD STULLER, deceased, WILMA STULLER, individually and as executor of the Estate of Harold Stuller and L.S.A., INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its Agency, Secretary, Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service.
Eriem Surgical, Inc. v. USA, et al
as 14-3540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIEM SURGICAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN A. KOSKINEN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
James Osterbur v. USA, et al
as 11-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES F. OSTERBUR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Department of the Treasury, NEAL K. KATYAL, Acting Solicitor General and others
Michael Gengler v. IRS, et al
as 11-1607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. GENGLER
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DEBRA K. HURST
Bloomfield State Bank v. IRS
as 10-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Michael Henry v. USA, et al
as 09-2398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
