Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Anthony v. SECO et al
as 5:2015mc00001
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony
Defendant:
SECO, Marion County Utilities, Marion Oaks Civic Association and others
Letterese v. Internal Revenue Service
as 0:2014cv62076
Plaintiff:
Peter D Letterese
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Salmonson v. Internal Revenue Service Department of Treasury
as 2:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Chris Salmonson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Kawa Orthodontics, LLP v. Lew et al
as 9:2013cv80990
Plaintiff:
Kawa Orthodontics, LLP
Defendant:
Jack Lew, U.S. Department of Treasury, Daniel I. Werfel and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Roberts et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2013cv01731
Plaintiff:
John Roberts and Joanna Roberts
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Marijan v. Bialon et al
as 2:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kristina Marijan
Defendant:
Klaus Bialon , United States of America, Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Spouse of Klaus Bialon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Actions affecting property which US had lien
Schonberg v. Romney et al
as 5:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Schonberg
Defendant:
Willard Mitt Romney and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Terroba Wolff v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2012cv61157
Plaintiff:
Carlos Javier Terroba Wolff
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Internal Revenue Service and D. Michelle Sosa
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Beekman Vista, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
as 9:2012cv80346
Plaintiff:
Beekman Vista, Inc.
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Hill v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2012mc00009
Petitioner:
John L. Hill
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
