Cases 1 - 10 of 1,416
D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03919
Plaintiff:
J. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ingrid Cisneros Martinez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2154
Petitioner:
INGRID CISNEROS MARTINEZ and J D C.M.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brunner v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Defendant:
William Wright, City of Payson Police Department, J Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfaro v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Samantha Alfaro
Defendant:
City of Payson Police Department, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raquel Stith v. Wesley Townsend
as 24-6505
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL STITH
Defendant:
J. D. FULK, Lieutenant/Watch Commander and WESLEY TOWNSEND, Chief of Security/Captain
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Brunner v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant:
J. Thompson, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iannacone v. Ellison et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
William Iannacone
Defendant:
J. D. Ellison and The Nicholas County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J. D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02841
Plaintiff:
J. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC and Raiser-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
