Cases 1 - 9 of 9
W. et al v. Oxford Health Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Neil W. and J. W.
Defendant:
Oxford Health Insurance Company and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
W. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
J. W.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, S&P Global Inc Group Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
W. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al
as 2:2021cv00597
Plaintiff:
R. W. and J. W.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
W. et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Welfare Plan, ADP Totalsource Inc Health and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
N. W. and J. W.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
W. et al v. UMR et al
as 4:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Dignity Health Welfare Benefits Plan and UMR
Plaintiff:
Jordan W. and J. W.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
W. et al v. BlueCross BlueShield of Texas
as 1:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
M. W. and J. W.
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
W. et al v. Oxford Health Insurance et al
as 2:2019cv00201
Defendant:
ADP Totalsource Inc Health and Welfare Plan, The, Aetna Health Insurance, Oxford Health Insurance and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey W., J. W. and Neil W.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mager et al v. Tow-Pac et al
as 2:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Paul Mager and Faye Mager
Defendant:
Tow-Pac and J&W Marketing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MW, SW and JW v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah
as 2:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
M. W., M. W., M. W. and others
Defendant:
Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
