Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Christopher Andre Vialva v. T. J. Watson, et al
as 20-2710
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDRE VIALVA
Mikeal Stine v. T. Watson
as 20-2654
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Antonio Crawford v. T. J. Watson
as 20-2563
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16537
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C., LLG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Clarence D. Schreane v. T. J. Watson
as 20-2464
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Applicant:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Dale Hartkemeyer, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2262
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE HARTKEMEYER, also known as Seigen and MARK O'KEEFE, Father
Daniel Lewis Lee v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Earlene Branch Peterson, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2252
Defendant / Appellant:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EARLENE BRANCH PETERSON, KIMMA GUREL and MONICA VEILLETTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
