Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Glicenia Logan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp, et al
as 20-2940
Defendant / Appellee:
Mellon Financial, Dreyfus Investment Advisors, The Vanguard Group
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glicenia C. Logan
Trex Properties LLC v. Able Electropolishing Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04159
Defendant:
Revcor, Inc., Fabricated Metals Co., Lipke-Kentex Corporation
and others
Plaintiff:
Trex Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: Environmental Cleanup Expenses
A. B., et al v. Chart Industries, Inc., et al
as 19-15885
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K. L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, E. F., C. D.
and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
SHERLENE WONG, LAWRENCE WONG
Defendant:
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER, PACIFIC MSO, LLC, PRELUDE FERTILITY, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
A. B., et al v. Prelude Fertility, Inc., et al
as 19-15888
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K. L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, E. F., C. D.
and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRELUDE FERTILITY, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
SHERLENE WONG, LAWRENCE WONG
Defendant:
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER, PACIFIC MSO, LLC, CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
A. B., et al v. Pacific MSO, LLC, et al
as 19-15886
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K. L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, E. F., C. D.
and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
SHERLENE WONG, LAWRENCE WONG
Defendant:
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER, CHART INDUSTRIES, INC., PRELUDE FERTILITY, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
PACIFIC MSO, LLC
Cooper Drum Cooperating Parties Group v. Angeles Chemical Co Inc et al
as 2:2019cv03007
Defendant:
Angeles Chemical Co., Inc., Pacific Die Casting Corporation, Angelus Waterproofing and Restoration, Inc.
and others
Plaintiff:
Cooper Drum Cooperating Parties Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
TW Tedesco Properties, L.P., On Atlantic, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
JET CUSTOM CHROME, All State Welding Alloy, GREGGS HONDA SERVICE
and others
Cross Defendant:
Zoes, Far-Best Corporation, Angeles Chemical Company Incorporated
and others
Cause Of Action: Real Property Tort to Land
York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund et al v. Rambo et al
as 5:2019cv00994
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Lebenthal & Co., LLC
and others
Plaintiff:
Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund, York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund, City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: Securities Fraud
In Re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation
as 5:2018cv03509
Defendant:
Jason P. Wells, David S. Thomason, Christopher P. Johns
and others
Plaintiff:
David C. Weston, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund
and others
Interested Party:
Ron Williams
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Appellee:
Official Committee of Tort Claimants
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re: Lehman Brothers Holding
as 18-1079
Defendant / Appellee:
Solar V CDO LLC, as Co-Issuer, Crown City CDO 2005-2 Limited, as Issuer, ALTA CDO LLC, for Series 2007-2,, as CoIssuer
and others
Amicus Curiae:
Structured Finance Industry Group, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., Principal Life Insurance Company
Petitioner:
William J. Harrington
In re: REV 973 LLC v. USDC-CALA
as 16-72624
:
In re: REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Petitioner:
REV 973 LLC, a California limited liability company
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MIREILLE MOUREN-LAURENS, an individual, MOUREN-LAURENS OIL COMPANY, a corporation
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
