Cases 1 - 10 of 1,289
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HAKAMI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
AHMED ABDULLAH A HAKAMI
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LIU LAYER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
SHANSHAN LIU LAYER
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01832
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ZHENG et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
RAN ZHENG, RUIQI WANG, LUNING WANG and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SWIDAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01791
Plaintiff:
KARAM SWIDAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
