Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Li et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06392
Plaintiff:
Yan Nan Chen, Yan Qing Chen and Hua Li
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08504
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hakaj v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv08101
Plaintiff:
Valmira Hakaj
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and Phyllis A. Coven
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05743
Plaintiff:
Quan Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jiang v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv04704
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Robert Cowan, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Yun Jiang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05156
Plaintiff:
Ya Ting Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05154
Plaintiff:
Meng Ting Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv07173
Plaintiff:
Ming Hui Lin
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555
Tian v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03478
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Zhi Keng Tian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhu v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Yong Mei Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
