Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Benitez et al v. TYS Laundromat et al
as 1:2018cv11034
Defendant:
Xiong Lin, Qui Jin Yang and TYS Laundromat
Plaintiff:
Juana Florentino and Nicholas Benitez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07521
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ke et al. v. Jubao House Inc. et al.
as 1:2015cv09447
Plaintiff:
Jin Guo Ke and Dai Yong Yang
Defendant:
Jubao House Inc., Lai Yun Inc., Yun Cai Brother Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen et al v. New Trend Apparel, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
Lifeng Chen , Sunning Eagle Holdings Limited , Zhejiang Meibang Textile Co. Ltd. and others
Defendant:
New Trend Apparel, Inc. , Kisum Louie , John Doe and others
Counter_claimant:
New Trend Apparel, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
New Trend Apparel, Inc. , Lifeng Chen , Sunning Eagle Holdings Limited and others
Petitioner:
SEUNG-JIN YANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jin Yang Shipping Co., Ltd v. M/S Lords Polymer ( I ) Pvt. Ltd
as 1:2009cv04998
Plaintiff:
Jin Yang Shipping Co., Ltd
Defendant:
M/S Lords Polymer ( I ) Pvt. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Sino East Transportation Co. Ltd. v. Jin Yang Shipping Co. Ltd.
as 1:2008cv08898
Plaintiff:
Sino East Transportation Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Jin Yang Shipping Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
