Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wellness Brands, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Wellness Brands, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Petitioner:
GrabAds Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. Siemens Energy, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01845
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Siemens Energy Inc., John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Interested Party:
General Electric Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacobbi v. Sirius XM Radio Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Mark J Jacobbi
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc. , Unnamed John Doe 1 and Unnamed John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Rohner v. Trustco Bank, NA et al
as 8:2013cv02199
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Rohner
Defendant:
Trustco Bank, NA, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dunn v. General Motors Corporation et al.
as 8:2008cv01280
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Dunn
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation, Jayco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daddario v. Emerald Coast RV Center, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv00571
Plaintiff:
Frank Anthony Daddario
Defendant:
Emerald Coast RV Center, LLC, Dusty's Camping World, Pepco RV Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
