Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Todd et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02242
Plaintiff:
Mattie Todd and Ronnie Todd
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare Worldwide, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Scissom et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02239
Plaintiff:
Tammy Scissom and Kenneth Scissom
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Goodner v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02216
Plaintiff:
Tammy Goodner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02212
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cregan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02203
Plaintiff:
Adelle Cregan and Harold Cregan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Warner v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02199
Plaintiff:
Leslie H. Warner
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Broussard et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02211
Plaintiff:
Caroldine Broussard and Lucien Broussard
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Mason et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as MOW/4:12-cv-00751
Plaintiff:
Joan Mason and Carey L. Mason
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50 (fictitious)
Fung v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02210
Plaintiff:
Joyce Fung
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Brieske et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02206
Plaintiff:
Dolores Brieske and Derek Brieske
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
