Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Harrison v. Johnson & Johnson
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kara Harrison
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevenson v. McNeil-PPC Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
Sheila Stevenson
Defendant:
McNeil-PPC Inc, McNeil Consumer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Allen Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nielsen v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 1:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lynn J. Nielsen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ammons et al v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Lynn C. Ammons and Thomas B. Ammons
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beckstead v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Cicily Beckstead
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollingsworth v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Melanie W. Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Terri Davis and Daniel Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batis et al v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Georgeann Batis and John Steven Batis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taggart v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stephanie D. Taggart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
