Cases 21 - 30 of 575
Cronin v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as NYE/2:23-CV-06870
Plaintiff:
Cronin and Robyn Cronin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Procter & Gamble
Tuominen v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
as ILN/1:23-CV-13796
Plaintiff:
Tuominen and Tina Tuominen
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
Jennifer Baughman v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:23-CV-07737
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Baughman
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Kenvue Inc and others
BARTON et al v. RB HEALTH (US) LLC et al
as NJ/2:23-CV-20370
Plaintiff:
BARTON, ERIN BARTON, KIMBERLY BUSCAGLIA and others
Defendant:
RB HEALTH (US) LLC, Reckitt Benckiser, LLC, KENVUE, INC. and others
MCWHITE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
as NJ/3:23-CV-20379
Plaintiff:
MCWHITE and KAMONICA MCWHITE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Yousefzadeh v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as NYE/2:23-CV-06825
Plaintiff:
Yousefzadeh and Sandra Yousefzadeh
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
AUDELO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC et al
as FLN/3:23-CV-24250
Plaintiff:
AUDELO and STEVE AUDELO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and PROCTER & GAMBLE
Depaola v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as FLM/2:23-CV-00727
Plaintiff:
Depaola and Kristin Depaola
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, McNeil Consumer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Pack et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. et al
as CAE/2:23-CV-01965
Plaintiff:
Pack, Kenneth Levi Pack and Min Ji Jung
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
ABRAHAM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:23-CV-19763
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ABRAHAM
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
