Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Conover et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 6:2023cv02427
Plaintiff:
John Scott Conover, Tina Conover, Samantha Conover and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, John Jr Conover and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Letters v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Sally Letters
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
