Other Statutes Cases filed in Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 83
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Court In Civil Matters No. 31 In Buenos Aires, Argentina In The Matter of Mino Covo
as 8:2024mc00008
Not Yet Classified: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Court In Civil Matters No. 31 In Buenos Aires, Argentina
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
PETITION OF PINEWOOD TECHNOLOGIES ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 0:2024mc60119
Petitioner: Pinewood Technologies Asia Pacific Limited
Not Yet Classified: PETITION OF PINEWOOD TECHNOLOGIES ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the 11th Family Court of Istanbul in Istanbul, Turkey in the matter of Chi Gloria Toker v. Guglu Toker
as 3:2023mc01442
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the 11th Family Court of Istanbul in Istanbul, Turkey in the matter of Chi Gloria Toker v. Guglu Toker
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
as 3:2023mc00027
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National Labor Court of Original Jurisdiction No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Evangelina Cecilia Suarez v. The Coca Cola Company Co., Et Al.
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Federative Republic of Brazil v.
as 1:2023mc22372
Plaintiff: Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 for Judicial Assistance in Obtaining Evidence for Use in Foreign and International Proceedings Pending in the Federative Republic of Brazil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Rodriguez v. State of Florida et al
as 9:2023cv80855
Plaintiff: Suzette Grace Rodriguez
Defendant: State of Florida, Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Morancy et al v. Saloman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00714
Plaintiff: Jean Domonique Morancy, L.M. and Jean Dominique Morancy
Defendant: Sabrina Alex Saloman, Gerald Francis Znosko, Angela Lynn Lambiase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morancy et al v. Saloman et al
as 0:2023cv60679
Plaintiff: Jean Domonique Morancy and L.M.
Defendant: Sabrina Alex Saloman, Gerald Francis Znosko, Angela Lynn Lambiase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National First Instance CIvil Court NO. 7 of the Federal Capitol in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Guillermo Benito Villanueva V. Adriana Laura Carba
as 3:2023mc00012
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the National First Instance CIvil Court NO. 7 of the Federal Capitol in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Matter of Guillermo Benito Villanueva V. Adriana Laura Carba
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Peele et al v. The 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County, Florida, et al
as 2:2023cv14037
Plaintiff: Tamiko N. Peele and Robert L Walker
Defendant: The 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County, Florida, as Successor in Interest to, it's Court Registry Depository Funds Reserve Notes of $180,030.00 U.S. Currency, it's Records, DOES 1-3 inclusive in their individual and official capacity, The United States of America, through its Social Security Administration Program, it's Cooperative Disability Investigations Program (CDI) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?